View Full Version : Dany Marinetto & Andressa Olivetto
Louie Damazo
01-26-2013, 05:01 PM
Well
This hardcore still not avaliable (i m posting it saturday , jan , 26)
Why i m making a mention about it? Because this set marks changes in aproachs we ll do in pics and vids (more vids). I got few complains about fact we re following same style in many many sets and now i ll try something really better. Shooting is harder, editation takes 3 times more time but final result ll make u pretty happy i guess.
What i expect from u is a feedback for i be sure is following right way for increase quality of our stuff and make u guys still more happy.
Thanks for the atention
lordworm
01-26-2013, 07:29 PM
Exploring a new video style? I would love to see the result of that.
Btw do you guys use fluffers for the girls during a scene?
Louie Damazo
01-26-2013, 07:52 PM
Exploring a new video style? I would love to see the result of that.
Btw do you guys use fluffers for the girls during a scene?
I think new style is just awesome but is only my opinion
No fluffers in set but some times actors helps
lordworm
01-26-2013, 08:19 PM
Ah, idk if fluffers cost too much but it would be great to keep the girls erect even while they are bottoming. But maybe it's too much work?
Louie Damazo
01-26-2013, 08:28 PM
Ah, idk if fluffers cost too much but it would be great to keep the girls erect even while they are bottoming. But maybe it's too much work?
I m pretty exciting with new aproach in the hardcores videios, looks so much more nasty. If u guys aprove i ll work in many ideas in this style
lordworm
01-26-2013, 09:46 PM
That sounds good to me. Idk what it is that the evil angel guys do but their girls are always erect in scenes. Is it fluffers? Drugs? lol
Louie Damazo
01-26-2013, 10:17 PM
That sounds good to me. Idk what it is that the evil angel guys do but their girls are always erect in scenes. Is it fluffers? Drugs? lol
Full erect all the time looks so unatural to me. Its like people use dozen of viagras. I like the evolution of excitment. Start soft cock and with evolution of the set u see cocks becaming hard and making the action
lordworm
01-26-2013, 10:46 PM
I just like seeing the girls erect during the fucking. When the girl getting fucked is also hard it's the best. You don't see it too often in grooby sites but it really makes a difference.
Louie Damazo
01-27-2013, 12:02 AM
I just like seeing the girls erect during the fucking. When the girl getting fucked is also hard it's the best. You don't see it too often in grooby sites but it really makes a difference.
I kave it yes but more in shemalesfromhell because have more guy x ts scenes what, of course, turn on more the trannies
lordworm
01-27-2013, 12:37 AM
Yeah I guess. I figured you could use male fluffers off camera for the tg/tg stuff to keep em hard.
Edit: Btw, I hope one day these scenes can look something like this quality and hardcore nasty wise http://i54.fastpic.ru/big/2013/0126/dd/3ab82a005e0f1be3fca03f5d3e34e7dd.jpg
Replace the actors with 2 hot tgirls and that image is exactly what would win all.
EuropeanWater
01-27-2013, 04:24 AM
its 1/27/13 and i dont see the video louie. when its uploaded , i will give you my feed.
adfan
01-27-2013, 07:20 AM
Full erect all the time looks so unatural to me. Its like people use dozen of viagras. I like the evolution of excitment. Start soft cock and with evolution of the set u see cocks becaming hard and making the action
yep i agree with this plus any of these companies expecting performers to use excessive viagra dont really care their health. I mean viagra is dangerous to begin with and too much can have adverse side affects. Life goes on after shoots but these other sites dont care about the actual people.
lordworm
01-27-2013, 07:44 AM
...or they probably make good use of fluffers.
Louie Damazo
02-01-2013, 11:50 AM
yep i agree with this plus any of these companies expecting performers to use excessive viagra dont really care their health. I mean viagra is dangerous to begin with and too much can have adverse side affects. Life goes on after shoots but these other sites dont care about the actual people.
U did a very important observation and isn totally true. They not only give many viagras but in some cases use a injection direct in the cock that keep erectio hard rock for hours. Come on, it can be good, so dangerous. Rarelly i let a model use more than 1 viagra, i just cant play with them lifes
EuropeanWater
02-04-2013, 02:56 PM
U did a very important observation and isn totally true. They not only give many viagras but in some cases use a injection direct in the cock that keep erectio hard rock for hours. Come on, it can be good, so dangerous. Rarelly i let a model use more than 1 viagra, i just cant play with them lifes
thinking about your employees, you are a good employer:)
madhatter22
02-04-2013, 07:28 PM
Well
This hardcore still not avaliable (i m posting it saturday , jan , 26)
Why i m making a mention about it? Because this set marks changes in aproachs we ll do in pics and vids (more vids). I got few complains about fact we re following same style in many many sets and now i ll try something really better. Shooting is harder, editation takes 3 times more time but final result ll make u pretty happy i guess.
What i expect from u is a feedback for i be sure is following right way for increase quality of our stuff and make u guys still more happy.
Thanks for the atention
Hey fellas, it's been awhile!
I figured I'd comment on the new style Damazo has taken with his most recent scene. Figured this thread was better than making a new one, I suppose.
I noticed a few deviations from previous updates, mostly the increased focus on faces and a lot of transitions between viewing angles, versus the gradual movement of the camera from one angle to the next.
I think this new more "active" style of shooting is good, but has it's pros and cons, at least for my tastes. First, I'll tackle the transitions, since I think that's the biggest change in style for the most part. I feel the transitions are a good change, but only in moderation. I feel there were too many transitions too quickly, and as the viewer, I wasn't able to really enjoy the scene as much as I would have liked, because my favorite viewing angle would be interrupted by a transition (either to the face of one of the ladies, or a different angle to view the action).
As far as showing the faces a bit more, I think that as well has to be done with a bit more control. I feel the scene is more hot when the ladies are really enjoying each other, more than the camera-man if that makes any sense. I get more excited when the ladies are visibly being excited by each other. Plus this gives less of a sense that they are acting for us, and more that they want to, for lack of a better phrase, fuck each other's brains out.
I hope this criticism helps, and I really enjoy to see the next scene, and how it evolves. This style is hot because it's engaging, but too much engagement loses the over-all effect of excitement that you're trying to portray.
Sorry for the long post, but I hope people can agree or disagree, and we can move on from there! Thanks again for all the great uploads, and for thinking of the viewers, as well as the actresses!
Louie Damazo
02-04-2013, 09:50 PM
Hey fellas, it's been awhile!
I figured I'd comment on the new style Damazo has taken with his most recent scene. Figured this thread was better than making a new one, I suppose.
I noticed a few deviations from previous updates, mostly the increased focus on faces and a lot of transitions between viewing angles, versus the gradual movement of the camera from one angle to the next.
I think this new more "active" style of shooting is good, but has it's pros and cons, at least for my tastes. First, I'll tackle the transitions, since I think that's the biggest change in style for the most part. I feel the transitions are a good change, but only in moderation. I feel there were too many transitions too quickly, and as the viewer, I wasn't able to really enjoy the scene as much as I would have liked, because my favorite viewing angle would be interrupted by a transition (either to the face of one of the ladies, or a different angle to view the action).
As far as showing the faces a bit more, I think that as well has to be done with a bit more control. I feel the scene is more hot when the ladies are really enjoying each other, more than the camera-man if that makes any sense. I get more excited when the ladies are visibly being excited by each other. Plus this gives less of a sense that they are acting for us, and more that they want to, for lack of a better phrase, fuck each other's brains out.
I hope this criticism helps, and I really enjoy to see the next scene, and how it evolves. This style is hot because it's engaging, but too much engagement loses the over-all effect of excitement that you're trying to portray.
Sorry for the long post, but I hope people can agree or disagree, and we can move on from there! Thanks again for all the great uploads, and for thinking of the viewers, as well as the actresses!
I think got your point, ll work in a eedition more as how u ask
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.